Basically our first interaction in play was in the PU seasonal where I ended up losing in a g3 thanks to an unwinnable pawniard webs vs no pawniard webs matchup. From that first interaction, I already got hints from you that me calling it unwinnable and all down to matchup was an issue, and you thought it was some sort of john. I just didn't really pay that much attention. Following that though we had all of the continuing events and the start of the zard hates hax meme. At this point, as far as I understand, you now think that every time I lose I blame hax, I have some sort of excuse, and I think that I'm really a great player struck low by bad luck. This is what your point is predicated on from what I understand.
The reason I've totally disrespected that opinion is that it's based on something as straight up wrong as the idea that I have an incorrect outlook on hax and matchup, and the correct way to view it is to totally ignore it unless it's massively game changing. I'm taking that stance from you just because you've insinuated what I've done isn't ok, but made some pretty extreme salt posts yourself. I just don't see it that way. The way I see it, people non ironically using the meme including yourself are the ones having a terrible outlook on hax and matchup, and I'm not being facetious. They are part of the game. Not accepting it as something people will mention or be annoyed about simply isn't a healthy way to look at it because it's just another factor. When I say I had an unwinnable matchup in that game or would've beaten Rawmelon week 1 without hax, understand two things: I legitimately believe that, and that doesnt change the fact that I lost. For example, maybe I shouldnt have brought webs since you brought a ton of pawniard webs that tour. I certainly choked a bit vs Rawmelon in addition to the hax, Signal Beaming Duosion was the better play rather than setting up a Nasty Plot again. You have the misconception that I can't accept and move past this, but really any mention of it is what has gone into triggering you. When Evan said only complain when it matters, this is really what I try to do (although I was absolutely worse in the past). You may not believe the hax vs amber lamps mattered, but it was frustrating because my entire play throughout the game was setting him up for that scenario which ended up being taken away from me and I still think I had a shot to win there. That doesn't change the fact that I choked early game though, nor does it justify you attacking me over it. I didn't think you were serious just because this seems totally apparent to me and I'm only now thinking that maybe it's not something you think.
In addition to that, is this seriously where you're going to get off attacking users? Like, let's say I just legitimately have a terrible outlook on hax. So? Does that mean you should continue going out of your way to attack me? I'm kind of curious to see where that's justified or if you can do that and then think you've been such a saint yourself. This part of the argument I admit I may have 100% wrong, but I'm led to believe this isn't right by receiving support from people saying "damn zard sorry you have to deal with attacks like that". I don't see why you've felt the need to attack me, which is again why I didn't really think it was serious because why would you continually attack me in posts and in the room for very little reason? If I make a post you think is overly salty, nobody cares. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
e: Anty also reminded me that I can point to posts of yours where everybody else thinks the salt is total bullshit and nobody cares
http://www.smogon.com/forums/threads/pu-winter-seasonal-round-6.3566366/page-2#post-6701649
You may not think you were attacking me, rather that you made some posts and I overreacted and you've simply been putting me in my place. Please know I'm only using that as what I see as the most comparable word here. I'm the one getting shit and dealing with attack posts and a hate meme, with the sole exception being the one up there in which I told you to stop posting which I've apologized for since that didn't help the conversation. The point still stands around I don't really think you have any merit to come after me about this.