thatsmylatios i don't know if your dislike of gays and your rigid framework of sexual behavior stem from your religious beliefs (in which case i would not argue with you) but if not i'd ask you to try to be more understanding of the realities of human sexuality, please
i agree with vintage books. the concept of being sexually attracted to one sex but occasionally being interested in members of the opposite sex is one that's completely misunderstood by society today. that's why it seems so weird!
i'm not going to go into the gender binary here -- i understand that there are such designations as intersex, asexual, genderqueer and whatever else that complicate things but because those comprise a super small number of the population it makes more sense to just talk about homos and heteros for the time being
something alfred a kinsey said:
Males do not represent two discrete populations, heterosexual and homosexual. The world is not to be divided into sheep and goats. It is a fundamental of taxonomy that nature rarely deals with discrete categories... The living world is a
continuum in each and every one of its aspects.
and here's something from the american psychological association
Sexual orientation is commonly discussed as a characteristic of the individual, like biological sex, gender identity, or age. This perspective is incomplete because sexual orientation is always defined in relational terms and necessarily involves relationships with other individuals. Sexual acts and romantic attractions are categorized as homosexual or heterosexual according to the biological sex of the individuals involved in them, relative to each other. Indeed, it is by acting—or desiring to act—with another person that individuals express their heterosexuality, homosexuality, or bisexuality. This includes actions as simple as holding hands with or kissing another person. Thus, sexual orientation is integrally linked to the intimate personal relationships that human beings form with others to meet their deeply felt needs for love, attachment, and intimacy. In addition to sexual behavior, these bonds encompass nonsexual physical affection between partners, shared goals and values, mutual support, and ongoing commitment.
[2]
in short: sexual attraction doesn't exist in a vacuum but can depend on specific people, AND most people's sexuality exists somewhere along a spectrum, it's not completely polarized as the media would have you believe. really, all we get in movies/tv/books/comics/culture is GAY or STRAIGHT or BISEXUAL (or jack harkness) meaning that characters either only want to be sexually involved, romantically involved, emotionally involved with just women, or just men, or they're super promiscuous beings. so that's why the notion of wanting to have any kind of intimate experience with another guy or girl seems so weird especially to people who define as straight. i'm sexually attracted to women. when i see a girl i normally want to fuck her (sorry to be crude, but i'm just talking in sexual terms) and when i see a guy i don't want to fuck him. but i have felt a small amount of sexual attraction towards some guys, like hey wouldn't it be fun to suck his dick? or something like that, and i honestly think that that's normal.
straight "pride" means nothing. you do know that in the greco-roman world, most people were sexually mixed, and the real indicator of status was whether you fucked people in the ass or were fucked in the ass yourself? submissive vs. dominant, not straight vs. gay. you could fuck 1000 17 year old boys in the butt and be seen as the most manly dude alive, but if you performed oral sex on a woman you would be instantly seen as submissive and weak. and try to tell me there were bigger badasses than the spartans. in fact if you think about it what's more manly than fucking another man right? i'm proud of liking girls, and i'm not ashamed that i think some of my guy friends are attractive! and the more you think about it you realize that liking someone just means you like them -- you don't have to make a huge deal out of being ***gay*** and come out to your parents and everything and star in glee the musical, we just like to lump everyone into these very precise categories when human sexuality is really much more of a scatterplot than a binary. this is so obvious for so many factors of human experience (school, dating, sports, art,....literally anything you can think of has dumb designations that don't conform to the variegated types of people that "should" fit into them) so why is it weird that it applies to sexuality?
i'm aware that this is probably the gayest post i've ever written, but i think it's important to note that times and social attitudes determine sexual modalities, they're not **completely** innate!
edit because i don't want to turn this into a huge argument about buttfucking
I'm secure in my sexuality so I can play gay chicken or make dumb jokes but tongue kissing a guy is fucking disgusting. If he had said "Every once in a while I'll bend over and take it up the ass from one of my straight guy friends just for fun" does that make him an extremely secure heterosexual?
this behavior seems disgusting to you Zacchaeus. i'm not sure why you feel you can make value judgments about sexual behavior that you are not wired to appreciate. feeling "secure" in one sexuality just means not feeling "oh, i had romantic feelings for this guy, does that mean i'm not a man/not attracted to girls?" the extreme-ness of the homosexual act has absolutely nothing to do with that feeling of secureness, WHICH LIKE EVERYTHING ELSE, DEPENDS ON THE SPECIFIC PERSON AND SPECIFIC CIRCUMSTANCES.
edit 2: okay so please edit your post "i personally feel that homosexual acts are disgusting" <-- i wish you didn't but it's marginally less dumb and offensive than blanket statements